UTSI

Edit Template
UTSI International specializes in OT/ICS cybersecurity

How Algorithms Find Tiny Tears Before They Become Big Disasters

A tiny tear in a piece of fabric can destroy the whole thing if you don’t catch it early. A small crack in a dam can grow until it becomes a flood. The same is true for the pipelines that transport our world’s important resources. A pinhole-sized leak might seem small, but it’s a tiny tear that can grow or accumulate into an environmental and financial disaster. What if you had a system that could feel that tear the moment it happens? That’s the job of advanced algorithmic tools like UTSI’s LeakGeek, which act as a 24/7 monitor, looking for small leak signatures as they happen.

The Problem Why Small Leaks are a Big Deal

When people think of a pipeline leak, they often picture a dramatic gusher. But the very common and tricky problems are the small ones: the slow seeps and drips that don’t cause a sudden, obvious pressure drop. These are the leaks that can go completely unnoticed by traditional monitoring systems for days, weeks, or even longer.

While they’re small, the damage they cause is enormous. Over time, they lead to:

Significant Product Loss: A small drip adds up. Barrel by barrel, valuable product is lost, which directly hits the bottom line.

Environmental Damage: Slow leaks silently contaminate soil and groundwater, resulting in substantial cleanup costs and reputational harm.

Safety Risks: A slow leak of a volatile substance can create a serious safety hazard that builds up over time before anyone is aware of it.

For a long time, the only way to find these leaks was through manual inspections or simple alarms that weren’t sensitive enough to catch them. Operators faced a constant challenge, trying to find a needle in a haystack with limited tools.

How Does an Algorithm “See” a Leak?

So how does a smart system spot an almost invisible problem? It doesn’t use cameras or sensors on the outside of the pipe. Instead, it uses powerful software and a clever process to understand what’s happening on the inside.

Unlike systems that rely solely on AI predictions, LeakGeek follows a structured data workflow that integrates:

AI-driven data validation to ensure signal integrity and eliminate noise,

AI-assisted data labeling to enhance supervised learning accuracy,

Domain-specific leak detection models where AI is used as a tool—not the sole decision-maker.

This hybrid approach allows LeakGeek to reduce false positive risk by over 90% as compared to traditional systems, significantly improving operational confidence. The system has been tested on multiple real-world leak scenarios, demonstrating its ability to detect small leaks up to 8 hours faster than leading CPM systems—and in some cases, identifying leaks that CPM systems failed to detect entirely.

Detecting small leaks in liquid pipelines—those ranging from less than ~1% to ~5% of nominal flow—is one of the most challenging tasks in pipeline integrity monitoring. These leaks often fall below the sensitivity threshold of traditional Computational Pipeline Monitoring (CPM) systems, and any false positive alarm can trigger costly operational shutdowns, making precision and reliability paramount.

LeakGeek does not aim to replace existing CPM systems or require additional instrumentation. Instead, it functions as a modular “Lego block” that integrates seamlessly with current infrastructure by using the same input data as CPM systems. This makes it highly efficient to test, validate, and deploy without disrupting existing operations or requiring capital investment in new sensors.

By leveraging a structured AI/ML workflow—including AI-driven data validation, AI-assisted data labeling, and domain-specific leak detection models—LeakGeek reduces false positives by over 90%. It has been validated on multiple real-world leak scenarios, detecting small leaks up to 8 hours faster than CPM systems and even identifying leaks that CPM systems failed to detect.

LeakGeek was developed in close collaboration with one of the leading major operators of liquid pipelines, ensuring that its design and functionality were grounded in real-world operational needs and constraints. This partnership enabled the system to be tested across a diverse set of pipeline environments—including gathering lines, transmission lines, and tank stations—each presenting unique challenges in terms of flow variability, instrumentation density, and operational dynamics.

Through this extensive field validation, LeakGeek demonstrated its ability to detect small leaks with high accuracy and minimal false positives, even in complex and noisy data environments. The collaborative development process also ensured that the system could be easily integrated into existing workflows, using data already available from CPM systems without requiring new instrumentation or infrastructure changes.

This real-world testing not only validated the system’s performance but also accelerated its readiness for deployment, making LeakGeek a practical and scalable solution for operators seeking to enhance their leak detection capabilities without disrupting current operations.

LeakGeek is designed to be scalable and easy to implement because it doesn’t reinvent the wheel. Rather than replacing existing CPM systems, it complements them by using their outputs as inputs. LeakGeek treats the pipeline itself as the best pipeline calculator—leveraging the physics-based modeling and flow calculations already performed by CPM systems.

This approach allows LeakGeek to operate as a lightweight, modular enhancement that fits into existing workflows without requiring new instrumentation or infrastructure changes. By building on top of trusted systems and data sources, operators can deploy LeakGeek quickly, test its performance in parallel, and scale its use across assets with minimal disruption.

This plug-and-play philosophy makes LeakGeek not only powerful but also practical—delivering advanced AI/ML capabilities while respecting the operational realities of pipeline management.

Conclusion

By using a hybrid approach of AI data-driven validation, data labeling and domain specific leak detection models, these systems find the tiniest tears before they can become big disasters. They change the stressful job of looking for leaks into a more manageable process, giving operators the clear guidance they need to keep everything running smoothly and safely.

Contact UTSI to help you find the tears before they become disasters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *